Comic-Fail: Marvel Women Pajamas

Just when I thought the comic industry was becoming more female friendly in their marketing, Marvel comes along and gives us these pajamas. They are supposed to be a sexy kind of sleepwear for the female comic fan, but really all they are is pretty hideous.

As if society wasn’t hard enough on the female body type and what is an acceptable size to wear, now even a size small can feel like she isn’t thin enough, or have breasts big enough to be a Marvel Heroine. The images on the tops are meant to create an hourglass figure of impossible proportions, the waist so small it would snap in half at the sheer weight of the breasts. To think someone working at Marvel/Disney sat down, looked at the concept and gave the green light is really disturbing. As a female reader, I sometimes feel like even the clothes designed for us have men in mind. Sadly, these seem to sell well and I don’t see a change in the future of similar products.

blackwidow

Black Widow gives you more cleavage, because your own just isn’t enough to be spy.

shehulk

She-Hulk was apparently “going commando” as Jennifer Walters. Sure, what woman wears panties with jeans?!

americandream

American Dream would be wearable if it weren’t for the disgustingly small waist.

emmafrost

Emma Frost is probably the least offending…anybody else find that ironic? How is the most scantily clad character the most “covered” in this line?

spider-girl

Spider-Girl is by far the most disturbing of the bunch. It might be the color scheme, which draws the eye to the waistline, but I see it and I cringe.

Once again, comics seem to FAIL when it comes to the female form. Good job Marvel! Maybe your next product can be the Comic Book themed “Barf Bag.” I have your slogan all ready for you,”You too can look like Black Widow. Just vomit into these three times a day and you will achieve the look that any man would be proud to have in his bed.”

Christina Flores
Christina@comicimpact.com

6 people have left comments

Posted on May 18, 2011 at 10:53 am

Tallest Silver wrote :

THANK YOU, Christina! When I saw this, I, too, was horrified for all the reasons you listed. In theory, it’s a cute idea. In practice, they failed miserably.

Posted on May 18, 2011 at 11:21 am

Naomi Pogroszewski wrote :

AGREED 100% Chris. I would have thought that most of these were cute IF they didn’t have the false waistline. What’s up with that?! I’m all for making cute comics clothing beyond the occasional girl cut T-Shirt but this is a giant fail.

Posted on May 18, 2011 at 11:46 am

Starman Matt Morrison wrote :

I am shocked - shocked that Marvel Comics would be completly insensitive to the realistic portrayal of the female form!

Seriously, this is awful… but sadly par for the course from The House Of (Bad) Ideas.

Posted on September 7, 2011 at 8:33 pm

clyde wrote :

these arent supposed to be in the Nolan universe, these are clearly supposed to be comic accurate. seems just fun to me.

Posted on February 8, 2012 at 2:11 pm

Dan wrote :

You are kidding, right? These are meant to be fun pajamas. No one in their right mind should be offended by this.  You’re shocked that Marvel is insensitive to the realistic portrayal of women? Well Im shocked at the unrealistic portrayal of physics! And humans can’t fly!  Those guys should be way less muscular too! Guess what? EVERYTHING and EVERYONE in comic books are exaggerated. Guys don’t look like Superman or the Hulk in real life.  Everyone knows that. Girls don’t really look like She-Hulk or Black Cat. These characters are “super heroes”. Last time I checked comics didn’t set the president for realism in any fashion. As far as this product goes, they sell shirts like this for guys too, with muscle definition painted on…because it’s supposed to be a fun novelty item. Big wow. People love to get up in arms over nothing. No one is at home crying themselves to sleep because of Marvel pajamas. 

Posted on February 8, 2012 at 2:31 pm

Maureen wrote :

I think they’re cute. They are comic book characters - superheroes, actually, so obviously not based in reality.

Leave a response:

Anti-Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree